A Liberal Approach to Healthcare in the 21st Century: Prevention Is Better Than Cure

Kayed Al-Haddad has the prescription for a more effective NHS.

Share

A close up of a male doctor with his arms crossed and carrying a red stethoscope in one hand.

The debate around healthcare in the UK is too often polarised between those who advocate for a US style system (private healthcare that is determined by the ability to pay, whether through insurance, income or state support) versus the UK model (the publicly funded NHS, free at the point of use).

Some argue for a hybrid of both, otherwise known as the ‘social-insurance model’ or the ‘Bismarck model’ (a health care system financed through compulsory, income-related contributions paid by employers and employees). However, regardless of the delivery system, the debate often misses a crucial aspect of healthcare which is rarely discussed, namely preventive medicine, which potentially has far-reaching consequences, both financial and personal.

Preventive medicine can proactively detect health issues before they become severe, significantly improving a patient’s future quality of life and extending lifespan. By shifting the focus from treating advanced illnesses to supporting wellness, this lowers medical costs, eases the burden on healthcare systems, and boosts societal productivity.

The current system at a glance

The National Health Service (NHS) is the UK’s publicly funded healthcare system. Founded with the core principle of being free at the point of use and based on need rather than ability to pay. It is one of few health-care systems in the world which is entirely free and funded directly by general taxation.

The NHS is organised horizontally. Administrative/commissioning bodies hold and allocate funds, while clinical care providers deliver the services. In primary care – the frontline of the NHS – this includes your local GPs (family doctors), dentists, community pharmacies, and opticians. Secondary care specialists deliver hospital care, which is typically accessed via a referral from a primary care provider. Lastly, there are integrated care systems (ICSs). In England, 42 local ICSs coordinate care. (These partnerships bring together NHS trusts, local councils, and charities to manage budgets and tailor care to the specific population’s needs.)

Change is on the government’s agenda

The new Labour Government has pledged an NHS overhaul, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stating that “this isn’t just going to be solved by more money, it’s solved by reform”. But the specific model has not yet been clarified. One notable think tank, the Institute of Economic Affairs, argued that the NHS should be replaced by a European-style social health insurance (SHI) system to boost the UK’s lagging healthcare outcomes (the UK consistently ranks lower in health outcomes – such as cancer survival compared to our European counterparts). In a recent report conducted by Lord Darzi, found the NHS to be in a ‘critical condition’. Moreover, Lord Darzi’s independent investigation concluded that the NHS is in ‘serious trouble’ with falling productivity, surging waiting lists, and a deteriorating state of the nation’s health. The report identified four major causes: a decade of austerity, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, absence of a patient and staff voice, and disruptive top-down reorganisation. I would like to suggest a policy proposal which I believe could transform the NHS and reverse its decline.

A Cuban style healthcare system incorporated into our NHS

The Cuban health system is a globally recognised, state-funded model built on hyper-local, preventive medicine and community primary care. It deploys neighbourhood family doctor-and-nurse teams to monitor the health of every citizen, shifting the focus from expensive hospital treatments to early, community-based interventions. Moreover, the system is highly decentralised and highly organised, allowing the island to achieve life expectancy and infant mortality rates much higher than comparable wealthy nations, despite suffering severe economic constraints such as embargoes and sanctions.

The three-tiered system can be explained as follows:

Tier 1: Community Clinics (Consultorios): the foundation of the system. A local family doctor and nurse oversee the health of about 150 to 300 families. They conduct morning check-ups and afternoon house visits to evaluate social, economic, and environmental factors affecting their patients’ health.

Tier 2: Polyclinics (Policlínicos): acting as community hospitals, these provide secondary care, emergency services, and host visiting specialists for the local consultorios.

Tier 3: Hospitals and Institutes: highly specialised tertiary care reserved for complex surgeries, cancer treatments, and advanced research.

How would this work in practical terms within the framework of our current NHS? Firstly, several community clinics (including GPs within them) would be set up in every council ward (parish or town councils) – covering no more than a population of say 10,000 people. These would collaborate with polyclinics. Subsequently, multiple polyclinics would be established in every council ward (district councils) to ensure that these serves no more than a population of say 50,000 people, who would then collaborate with hospitals. Finally, hospitals set up within a higher tier of local government (equivalent to county councils) would be managed by NHS Trusts*.

Incorporating a Cuban-style health system into our NHS, would still enable us to retain the key characteristic of the NHS; free treatment at the point of use, but this would allow us to massively improve clinical outcomes at a fraction of the cost to the British taxpayer when compared to a social-insurance model or a private health-care model. There are three areas that illustrate this.

Preventative focus over curative

Rather than waiting for patients to get sick, the Cuban-style health uses a preventative model: neighbourhood-based family doctors and nurses live in the communities they serve, allowing them to closely check individual health, environmental factors, and early warning signs of illness. In other words, the aim is to stop people getting ill in the first place rather than treating them afterwards.

Curative medicine implies making therapies available to a patient with the aim of fully resolving the problem and bringing her or him back to the health status they enjoyed previously. Preventive medicine also includes actions that guard against disease occurrence – actions targeted at eliminating or suppressing the impact of disease, or if not possible, slowing down the advancement of disease. A universal example of preventive medicine that can be seen today is the promotion of vaccination, to reduce the spread of an infectious virus, such as COVID-19.

Universal and free access

Access to healthcare in Cuba is enshrined as a constitutional right. This goes further than in the UK. All care—from routine checkups and complex surgeries to dental care and medication—is provided free of charge. A similar service here would allow us to retain a key pillar of the NHS, namely healthcare free at the point of use, without compromising the integrity of the NHS as a whole. Retaining such a pillar reduces the stigma low take-up associated with means-testing and builds broad public support for such an essential service, establishing an egalitarian baseline of dignity for everyone.

Exceptional Health Statistics

Some relatively poor countries’ health indicators rival or exceed those of much wealthier nations. Cuba has achieved a life expectancy averaging around 77-81 years and the country’s infant mortality rates are among the lowest in the Americas, typically, around 4 to 5 deaths per 1,000 live births, which is comparable to European countries like the Netherlands.

Integrating such a system into the NHS is another reason to make this change, given our current exceptionally low clinical outcomes, given our expenditure per head.

I believe my proposal for the NHS deserves consideration. Moving further towards private intervention is not the answer. Encouraging people to take a more active interest in their health by working with neighbourhood practitioners close at hand is the answer. Improved preventive care has the potential to extend everyone’s healthy life while saving the NHS significant amounts by not having to deal with problems that have been averted.


Kayed Al-Haddad is spokesperson for The Liberal Party for Economics, Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy.

Share

Comments

3 responses to “A Liberal Approach to Healthcare in the 21st Century: Prevention Is Better Than Cure”

  1. Andrew MacGregor avatar
    Andrew MacGregor

    Waiting lists are around 7 million in the NHS. There are 10s of thousands of under-employed or unemployed doctors of all skills types in the UK. A relatively modest additional 2% onto the budget would add an additional 30,000 doctors of all grades – including pay, pension and supervision costs.

    If any work is to be done to transition the NHS from reactive to proactive, the first stage is to genuinely reduce waiting lists across all areas.

    And to repeat, the cutting of welfare is likely to put an additional burden onto the NHS. Preventative means ensuring the populace has access to food, exercise, and properly funded medical care.

    1. Simon Robinson avatar
      Simon Robinson

      The NHS currently employs 134,000 hospital doctors and 36,000 GPs (Source: https://www.england.nhs.uk/ltwp/reforming-the-workforce/), so 30K more doctors would be a proportionately massive increase in numbers. Are there 30,000 unemployed doctors in the UK just sitting at home waiting for the NHS to call them and offer them a job? Seems pretty unlikely to me – and you can’t employ people unless there are people available to employ! Also, does the 2% more money you’ve suggested cover finding buildings and surgeries for these doctors to work in as well as the support staff they’d need, or is that just their salaries?

      It’s very easy to say, let’s spend more money to get X thousand more people. It’s a lot harder to actually do that.

  2. Richard Hopkins avatar
    Richard Hopkins

    As an NHS doctor for three decades my experience is that the greatest burden the NHS has had to bear is constant forced reorganisation after reorganisation, based on political whims, ephemeral clinical zeitgeist, and management consultancy plans written on the back of a fag packet. I would put this article’s proposal in that third category.

    If that sounds harsh, then perhaps the cries of anguish such ideas generate should be listened to. None of this is a defence of the NHS as it is. Of course it needs to change, as the demands on it change. But proposals such as this are akin to bunjee jumping without a rope, although the bean counters are not those being made to jump, the patients are.

    The absent rope in the article? Properly sourced, up-to-date and accurate outcome statistics. Comparable population demographic data, including morbidity indices. Different per capita staffing levels and projections from these. Confounding factors generated by very different cultural milieu. The impact of different political systems on aspects of consent and coercion. Etc, etc, etc.

    The notion that the NHS does not focus on prevention is simply wrong. It spends above OECD average levels on this. Not all things can be prevented, and not all prevention is positive. The recent debate on prostate cancer screening in the UK is a case in point.

    If I had the political power to improve the NHS how would I do it? Well firstly I would not pretend I had the answer. I would set up a team who could bring together expert knowledge from a wide perspective, and task them with producing high quality change programmes that could be externally peer reviewed (so not NHS England). I would do everything to limit vested interests, but I would not use the process to launch culture wars against specific professional groups (as Labour did). And I would not take submissions from fag packets, though I would suggest the suppliers of such advice see their local smoking cessation teams.

Leave a Reply

Comments are reviewed before publication. You will receive a notification by email when your comment is approved. Contributions that breach our guidelines will not be published. See our Comment Policy.

To display a profile photo next to your comments, register your email address with Gravatar.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *