Netanyahu and Gaza – How Should Britain Respond?

Andy Daer avatar

·

·

4 minutes of reading

·

4 comments on Netanyahu and Gaza – How Should Britain Respond?

Andy Daer calls for a reappraisal of our policy on Israel.

Share

A huge explosion in a building in Gaza, Palestine, as a result of a bombing by Israeli warplanes.

The Gaza Genocide has become an element in the long-planned continuation of the Greater Israel project, but it was initially an experiment. For Netanyahu, it was a test of the resolve of the western powers to uphold decades-old ideas about human rights and the ‘rules of war’ established after WWII, which were designed to protect civilians and outlaw the annexation of land occupied during hostilities.

He must have been surprised when there was so little response when he started pushing the envelope, but as time went on it became apparent that with active American encouragement, and a more passive kind of complicity from European leaders, notably our own prime ministers, first Sunak, then Starmer, he could do virtually anything he liked, including targeting hospitals, universities, schools, health workers, ambulances, bakeries, utility infrastructure, agricultural land, and of course, civilians in their tens of thousands.

Trump wades in

Having got away with what he had in Gaza, Netanyahu found it easy to talk the gullible president of the US into joining the attack on Iran, which in the light of the collapse of international conventions on the legality of war, had become feasible. The obvious way to keep Iran under check was to negotiate with the Iranian government a sanctions trade-off against international control of its arms industry, but Iran had been the object of Netanyahu’s obsessional hatred for decades, and he wanted to start killing people there as well.

As we know, all the available intelligence predicted precisely what has happened in the Persian Gulf – the economic disaster visited on the rest of the world by the blocking of the Straits of Hormuz. But Netanyahu has not only been able to revel in his use of the destructive power of the IDF (something which some might call ‘blood lust’ aroused by the war against the Palestinians, but which I regard as the expression of the sadistic side of human nature which takes actual pleasure in inflicting pain or death on a weaker adversary), he has made the world pivot around his tiny Middle Eastern country, something a less narcissistic man would regret, but which he probably finds very satisfying.

A blockade that might have been anticipated

Pete Hegseth told us the US was making the world a “gift” when it tried to undo the Iranian blockade on shipping in the Persian Gulf, unwisely drawing attention to an attempt which rapidly failed, and revealing just how little the US administration understands about how they are perceived by the rest of the world. On this side of the pond, our prime minister has latched onto the increase in attacks on Jews with noble speeches about stamping out antisemitism, apparently blissfully unaware that attacks on British Jews are the direct result of Netanyahu’s genocide in Gaza and the subsequent assaults in Lebanon and Iran.

Europe should urge restraint

What we now need to acknowledge is that the simple reason why we are facing potentially disastrous damage to world trade is that Netanyahu has been allowed to unleash his vision of Israel’s supremacy over Iran. The blame for this lies squarely at the door of the European leaders who failed to stop the genocide in Gaza.

We in the UK must blame the successive prime ministers who turned a blind eye – quite deliberately and culpably – to what was happening, and (even to this day) continue to support Israel with weapons and logistical support. The response of the current government to its embarrassment about being caught supplying Israel and being complicit in its war crimes, has been to brand Palestine Action, a group that speaks out, as terrorists, to talk about banning marches and other forms of protest about its own failures, and to promote the idea that they are ‘hate marches’.

We are left wondering if Keir Starmer is even aware of how his government’s failure to act over the genocide in Gaza has contributed to the releasing of the Israeli dogs of war in Iran, and the extent to which his failures have become one of the root causes of the subsequent economic hardship around the world.

If we are going to learn lessons from history, which we absolutely and urgently must, we should immediately admit that Israel can no longer be regarded as ally. Israel is no friend of ours, and is a reckless player on the world stage. It has now drawn the US into a conflict it must be bitterly regretting. We should immediately withdraw all support (by the RAF and through arms exports) and implement extensive sanctions – applied to Israel itself, not merely the settlers, as some advocate – and seek agreement for similar action by our European partners.


Andy Daer is a Liberal Democrat from South Gloucestershire.

Share

Comments

4 responses to “Netanyahu and Gaza – How Should Britain Respond?”

  1. David Barnsdale avatar
    David Barnsdale

    Looking at the devastation in Gaza it is easy to side with whoever opposes that … until you look at some of those opposing Netanyahu. First there is Hamas, who didn’t simply kill civilians in their operation on the 7th October 23, but launched an operation in which the murder and kidnapping of civilians was its chief aim. Hamas is a now a genocidal organization, it simply lacks the ability to carry it out. Fatah rules the West Bank because of a confused civil war, which Fatah describes as a Hamas coup but could just as easily be described as a Fatah coup against a Hamas democratically elected government. The West bank is now irredeemably corrupt.
    Maybe the “way to keep Iran under check was to negotiate with the Iranian government a sanctions trade-off against international control of its arms industry” but that would be an agreement to give the Iranian regime a free hand to continue to murder the people they rule. Exactly where, between the low figure of 3,000 killed (claimed by the regime) and the 40,000 (claimed by some opposition groups), the true figure lies, of those protesters murdered in January, the regime has shown it will murder as many Iranians as it takes to retain power.
    Finally, while no one should be arrested for expressing support for an organization, Palestine Action’s whole purpose is the organization of criminal acts. The law should be changed so that the police aren’t obliged to arrest anyone who expresses support for that organization but the ban should remain.
    Netanyahu has been reckless but it is a recklessness that Hamas wanted to provoke by the 7th of October attack in the hope of achieving their long term aim. Probably we shouldn’t regard Israel as an ally because of that. However sanctions goes beyond that to taking the side of Hamas against a country that continues to have free elections.

    1. David McDowall avatar
      David McDowall

      All the fault of Hamas, David Barnsdale? Really? What should we expect of a brutally oppressed people repeatedly denied the promises of self-determination for over a century? Britain made that duplicitous promise before it made the Balfour Declaration. As Balfour admitted, Britain double crossed the Arabs to create a colonial situation, masquerading as a Mandate. With the triumph of Jewish settlers, under British auspices, the Arabs of Palestine entered the next phase of subjugation under either Jordanian or Israeli rule, until 1967, when Israel became master of all Palestine, colonising all of it, further repressing its captive people and announcing Palestine would never be free. Almost every rule of the Laws of Occupation have been broken by Israel: land seizure, collective punishment, killings, torture. Read the Fouth Geneva Convention, almost every rule of which has been broken by Israel. Every Western state undertook to uphold and ensure respect for this Convention when it became party to it, but every single one has failed miserably to ensure that respect. No wonder resistance movements began. We may not like them or their methods but they were the inevitable outcome of oppression. I am repeatedly reminded of the Scots’ Declaration of Arbroath in 1320, for it proclaims a universal truth about the struggle for freedom: “It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honour that we are fighting, but for freedom, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”

      So, very well said, Andy Daer. Britain has routinely evaded its bounden duty to the Palestinian people, who should have been allowed their most fundamental human and political rights many decades ago. As Lord Carrington said of international failure over 40 years ago, “Palestine is an international disgrace.” I commend Peter Oborne’s recent book Complicit to any who doubt the shameful nature of what has taken place, and Britain’s central role in that shame.

    2. Andrew MacGregor avatar
      Andrew MacGregor

      There’s an interesting bias to your point. Legally in international terms the Palestinians have the right of violent resistance to an occupying force, particularly one that is a brutal murderous occupying force. Israel on the other hand has no right of defence enshrined in the international legal framework that applies to occupying forces and occupied people. That’s the legal framework against which you have to measure the overall disparity between the two sides. Then looking at Gaza (I won’t bore you with the historical context of the two sides from 1948) since 2005, it is clear that Israel is and always has been the aggressor. Netanyahu and others backed Hamas early on as an opportunity to undermine Fatah, with whom Israel had already reneged on a peace deal. They thought that the internal conflict between Fatah and Hamas would weaken both irreparably. It didn’t, so following the election win – all above board and according to the rules set by the occupying entity and the US – by Hamas, the Israelis decided to instal a blockade of Gaza – to all intents and purposes a continuation of the occupation. This blockade effectively designated Gaza as a ghetto or concentration camp surrounded on all sides by military forces within movement in and out severely restricted – a situation that continued when Egypt took on the southern border because that was the agreed arrangement with Israel (in my view it was agreed because Israel didn’t want their forces sandwiched Egyptian forces and Hamas militias) – including by sea. Water and electricity, food and medicines, fuel and equipment all restricted by Israel. Several times the EU helped Gaza with developing schools, universities, hospitals and even sewer systems, the Israelis confected a reason to enter and to destroy. This is verifiable fact. They even took away the small pleasures, like playparks and slaughtering all the animals in the small zoo. Those were quite minor incursions. When Israel launched major operations such as ‘Cast Lead’, ‘Pillar of Defence’ or ‘Protective Edge’ hundreds, or sometimes thousands of casualties amongst the civilian population occurred. In one of those its estimated that over 1300 CHILDREN were killed. Israel used (as they continue to do in their attack on Lebanon) white phosphorous – a banned chemical weapon – on civilians, including on schools and hospitals.
      now, October 7th may have been an attack that led Israel to its actions over the last 2 and a 1/2 years, but it is one that bears far closer scrutiny. The deaths of hundreds of Israelis and tourists (on land that had been annexed illegally anyway) actually was the result of direct action by the IDF. They instituted something called the Hannibal Directive (a policy of we’d rather kill our own than have them taken prisoner) then they launched a war. They claimed it was a war and as such they then have to abide by the rules of conflict that are set out in the 4th Geneva Convention – to which the Israelis are a state signatory. That means targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure are by definition – war crimes. The Israelis have put out all sorts of propaganda from the lie about the 40 babies, to the tunnels under the hospital, to the ridiculous finding (metal) rifles and metal cased) greandes beside the MRI machine – a laughable idea for anyone who can do a bit of research. To clarify the tunnels under al Shifa Hospital were known, because the IDF put them there (as admitted by former PM Ehud Barak). An MRI – even one that is disconnected still exerts an enormous magnetic force. The 40 babies is debunked, as were the mass rapes. The whole basis for Israel’s destruction of Gaza had nothing to do with Hamas and everything to do with their own final solution. A whispered policy since before Ariel Sharon was PM. Its about ethnic cleansing and ethno-supremacism. Oh, and 2019 Netanyahu was still supportive of Hamas.

  2. Andrew MacGregor avatar
    Andrew MacGregor

    In answer to the question “How should Britain (or the British Govt) respond?” we should look to our commitments to international and donestic law.

    The U.K. is not only a state signatory to the various treaties, covenants and conventions that international law is based on, it as a state was the lead state in drafting many of the terms along with the US, France, and even Russia. This means that we (the U.K.) as a state signatory have direct obligations to uphold these laws and to act against those who contravene them. That applies whether the state is nominally an ally or an enemy. There is no distinction between the two.
    We are also signatories to the International Criminal Court and were also heavily involved in its creation and guidance for action.
    It isn’t complicated no matter what you are told. The Israelis have committed war crimes. They’ve live streamed their murders of children, attacks on hospitals and other civilian infrastructure and we’ve all seen the murders of aid workers and ambulance personnel.
    Our obligation is to sanction and/or assist in the arrest anyone we are aware of who has participated in what is clearly war crimes and or genocide and or ethnic cleansing. These matters are clear in U.K. and international law. What we shouldn’t be doing as a country is allowing the Met Commissioner to reject investigations of suspected war criminals because of his politicisation of his office, or the former PM (acting in his role as Foreign Affairs minister) David Cameron making threats against the ICC prosecutor which is a perversion of justice.
    The U.K. should sanction Israel on every level.

Leave a Reply

Comments are reviewed before publication. You will receive a notification by email when your comment is approved. Contributions that breach our guidelines will not be published. See our Comment Policy.

To display a profile photo next to your comments, register your email address with Gravatar.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *