Write for us!Political philosophy
Why World Government Would Be a Bad Idea
·
·
In 1964, the Labour Party manifesto declared an aspiration for a single world government Labour always regarded the cold war strategies as a second best, forced on us by Russia’s obstinacy and remained faithful to its long-term belief in the establishment of east-west co-operation as the basis for a strengthened United Nations developing towards world government. World Government is not a mainstream idea in UK politics – and I can’t imagine today’s Labour Party going there. But within liberal and progressive circles, there’s some sympathy for the concept, presumably motivated by that liberal sense of internationalism and a desire to…
Lost in Translation: The Art of the Misquote
·
·
Few things are more confidently delivered, or more frequently wrong, than a famous quotation. We misquote for all sorts of reasons – faulty memory, wishful thinking, political convenience, or simple repetition of someone else’s error. But the misquote is rarely innocent. More often than not, the distortion tells us something interesting about the distorter. “Elementary, my dear Watson” Sherlock Holmes never said it. Not once across all of Arthur Conan Doyle’s stories. Holmes does say “elementary” in some stories, and obviously in the stories he does address Watson, but never together in that form. The phrase was cemented through stage…
Sex and Gender – an Extended Essay
·
·
So given the recent article “Identity is a human right” (Liberal Voices – George Cooper – 24 June) – I thought I would put my thoughts down on the sex and gender debate here. In this case from what I have called myself Phronetic Liberalism. Liberalism is an influence, but so are some other philosophical strands – from Ancient Greece and Rome, Mills Utilitarianism and William James Pragmatism. My starting point is that any conclusions must consider the practical outcomes for businesses and people in real life. This reflects the influence of Pragmatism in my framework. From this starting point,…
Identity Is a Human Right
·
·
Let’s stop dancing around the issue: yes, we have a vestigial biology, but what actually defines us is language. We live in a world created by language and it is in that world we must find our authentic selves. It’s the key thing that is essential for living a full, normal life. Gender Identity is what our true selves are – something we need to get in touch with because what matters is the recognition that it gives us in society. Luke Easley, of Center for Global Development (CDC), hit the nail on the head when he said, “Identity is…
The New EHRC Code Demonstrates Why Sex‑Based Laws Need a Root‑and‑Branch Review
·
·
Ed Davey, Leader of the Liberal Democrats, and Marie Goldman, the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for Women and Equalities, have recently written to Bridget Phillipson protesting the publication of the EHRC’s new Code of Practice for the Equality Act 2010 and declaring it not fit for purpose. Quite how balanced the evidence base was in reaching this conclusion is unclear. Nevertheless, their letter calls for the need for post-legislative scrutiny of the Gender Recognition Act and the Equality Act by a cross-party committee, “Taking evidence from all communities who have been impacted.” It suggests that the purpose of this is to…
Michael Meadowcroft, 6 March 1942–1 June 2026, Liberal MP and Political Philosopher
·
·
If Jo Grimond’s logic, clarity and calm rhetoric drew me to liberalism, Michael Meadowcroft’s understanding of the philosophy underpinning it, confirmed my place in the party. In the 1980s I moved to Battersea and with some difficulty managed to locate and join a moribund local Liberal Party – but that’s another story. The activities of Margaret Thatcher had made whinging from an armchair, or complaining to friends in the pub, insufficient and I needed to rekindle my political flame. Battersea is close to central London, so the next step was to join a Michael Meadowcroft initiative he had set up…
The Ballot and the Manipulated: Has Democracy Lost Its Way?
·
·
Other than being friends, Dan and I don’t have much in common on paper. He was born into poverty in Liverpool, left school at sixteen, joined the army, protested nukes at Greenham Common, drove taxis, raised a couple of children alone on next to nothing, and arrived at philosophy and anarchism through sheer intellect led bloody-minded curiosity. He’s precisely the kind of intellect that Stalin would have sent to Siberia. Me on the other hand, I came from a middle-class background that turned out to be as fractured as any – a mother who resented me, an early exit from…
Why Game Theory Is Breaking Britain – but Could Also Save It
·
·
Game Theory examines when and why people choose to cooperate or compete. Its central insight is that our decisions are shaped not only by what we want, but by what we expect others to do. Well known game theory scenarios include the Prisoner’s dilemma, the Cold War, and on a simpler scale, even Rock, Paper, Scissors. An important aspect of Game Theory relates to whether and why we choose to cooperate or compete. Researchers found that the success of either strategy is dependent on how others in the system behave, and that people instinctively know this. Our decision-making routinely includes…
A Liberal Approach to the State: A Twenty‑First Century Concept of the State’s Role
·
·
Historically, liberals viewed the state with caution and perhaps even indifference. Classical Liberals (like me), argued for a state which is restricted by a codified constitution, separation of powers and respect for the rule of law. Ultimately, the state is there to serve the interest of individuals, not to control them. However, this concept of the state is restricted to a somewhat archaic way of thinking that emerged out of the enlightenment period of the 17th and 18th century, most notably from thinkers such as John Locke. However, over three hundred years later and with the incredible advancement of technology…
Illiberalism in Defence of Liberalism
·
·
There is a long-standing mutual wariness between the Liberal Democrats and the continuing Liberal Party that anyone who has spent time around either organisation will recognise. What is perhaps surprising is that the sense of grievance seems, on balance, to run more strongly from the Liberal Democrat side than the other way around. This has sometimes led to accusations which, examined in the cold light of day, don’t quite survive reasonable scrutiny. They also seem to focus on one side’s behaviour rather than understanding that it is a two-way street. It would be churlish, in the first instance, not to…
How Not to Make a Magna Carta
·
·
A “New Magna Carta” was one of Ed Davey’s brand-new announcements at his speech to the Spring Conference on Sunday (15 March 2026). Let’s set aside the obvious question of how this has suddenly appeared as a new LibDem policy proposal without any consultation with the membership, and what this means for internal party democracy. After all, few Liberal Democrats would disagree with the principle of a written constitution. And it is certainly consistent with liberal values. But was what Ed was proposing really a good idea? I’m going to say no. It looks to me like he has taken…
The French Revolution and Human Rights – Early Steps Toward Modern Liberalism
·
·
The impression most people have of the French Revolution is a one of sensible moderates who were overcome by the radical extremists of Robespierre who then drowned the Revolution in blood. Jonathan Israel doesn’t dispute that part of the story but places on center stage a group of democratic republicans who briefly gained control of the Revolution and came close to establishing the first true modern democracy – before Robespierre staged the coup that led to them being sent to the guillotine. The Roots of the Revolution in the Radical Enlightenment Johnathan Israel has made the Enlightenment his main specialisation.…
Returning Fallibilism to the Forefront of Liberalism – The Importance of Maintaining Clear Philosophical Foundations
·
·
Across Western democracies, political debate is becoming more polarised and more fragile at the same time. Many voters feel that ideas cannot be discussed openly, while political parties increasingly struggle to explain what they actually stand for beyond individual policies. When parties lose the ability to articulate their philosophical foundations, politics becomes reactive rather than principled. It’s all very nice and easy to ask voters to vote tactically against people they dislike. That will always be part of politics. Getting voters to vote for your policies, even if for different reasons, can work too. Or parties can make pragmatic compromises.…
